John Cow dot COM - Latest Comments in Raking In The Pagerank

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

Michael Fultz — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 01:20:27 -0000

Hmm..25 to 50 bucks a month? That's worth going without sleep for the next 5 weeks for!

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

RB — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:38:26 -0000

Strange, I sent a paypal donation to M. Anderson's email 4 days ago but no link has shown up. How much did you guys donate? Maybe I sent too little?

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

KingJacob — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 11:44:42 -0000

Thats actually what I have to do, I have to show them my alexa,tech,3500 backlinks and point out why those 3500 are quality from high pr, so I have to convince each new buyer that their link will get traffic or that its a bargain buying my "pr0" links.

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

KingJacob — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 11:41:16 -0000

It was sarcasm but I guess sarcasms hard to read.

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

fatgadget — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 11:30:29 -0000

Lets hope they finish it soon :)

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

Sly from Slyvisions.com — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 10:23:01 -0000

The PR is late, but I think I can wait (and you guys should too). It's a perfect time to get more backlinks to your site!

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

Making The Money — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 09:35:01 -0000

Do you advertise your back link count to potential link buyers?

It's possible to have 100,000,000 backlinks all passing no rank, number of links wouldn't figure in my decision to buy.

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

Steven — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 03:12:28 -0000

Link for?

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

Steven — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 03:09:04 -0000

How so...

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

KingJacob — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:41:29 -0000

I love being a PR0 with 3600 backlinks, it make selling links so much easier.

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

CFernandes — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:58:38 -0000

It seemed the PR updated started almost a month ago but it has been very slow to update...

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

Angel — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:57:20 -0000

Ouch!

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

Cubofild — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 19:14:28 -0000

I think it's 20$

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

John Cow — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:57:25 -0000

Yes, guess paying $10 for a valid PR7 backlink would be silly if you can get one on CashQuests for the same prize where you share the PR0 with 25 others!

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

Cash Quests — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:52:28 -0000

No, they're not educated guesses. PageRank was created by Larry and Sergey while at Stanford University (and Stanford owns the patent). They published how it works and it remains the property of Stanford University. Of course, it has been changed and altered since then, but I'm sure the basic principles are still the same.

I don't think how it works is a big secret at all. If you get a one-way link from a PR7 site and you're the only link on that site, it makes logical sense that you'd get more PRjuice than from one with 100s of links.

Discovering how PR works isn't the hard part, getting the links is. And that's what holds people back from riches.

Sorry, but I still think buying a link there would be a waste.

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

MLS News — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:58:26 -0000

Last time I checked, and bought links off that site, was around 3 months ago. The minimum "donation" was $10 at the time/link. I have gotten links from them at 1$/link >6 months ago, when the whole world didn't know about their forum.

Anyone that gone one recently, is the price still at 10$/link ?

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

Personal Blog — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:39:02 -0000

I'm hoping for a PR4 at least. My original site is 5 and I'm making over $100/month on text links which is nice extra money. Then i'm hoping my blog gets a 4 at least, hopefully those predictors are right.

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

Steven — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:10:16 -0000

LOL anything is better than a PR 0, I'll take what I can get.

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

John Cow — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:36:38 -0000

We're never sure if it's with a T or D so we figured we'd stick with one of them so we wouldn't look too silly. It's not an American, Canadian or Aussie thing. We're Dutch cows.

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

Angel — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:32:40 -0000

One thing that really confuses me is how you use words like "sent" instead of "send", or "spent" instead of "spend". Is this some sort of American or Canadian or Aussie thing? I only ask because you do it all the time and it doesn't look like you do it by mistake.

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

MONEY BLUE BOOK — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:04:07 -0000

Hmm..how much are we talking about in terms of individual donation you think?

-Raymond (MONEY BLUE BOOK)

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

Israel — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:24:58 -0000

hey i jumped on board that link train but am not sure if you added me. i posted about it on my blog .

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

Making The Money — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:59:24 -0000

The formula that determines page rank is much more complicated than that, quite simply because otherwise everybody would copy it.

The main problem with having a link from a PR7 site that has hundreds of links is that every link will be valued at 0. Not becuase of the formula but because Google deems the site to be full of shit.

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

John Cow — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:47:26 -0000

Go FatGadget Go!

Re: Raking In The Pagerank

fatgadget — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:44:45 -0000

I am hoping to get a PR of 5 in the update, which is what is showing on iwebtool, not bad in 3 months, and thanks to the Mad Moo's for including me in their link train which has helped a lot :)