-
Website
http://www.johncow.com/ -
Original page
http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Gary Arndt
3 comments · 6 points
-
Ardy22
3 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
6 comments · 4 points
-
kevinpuls
20 comments · 1 points
-
cipals15
13 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Then again, these days it seems like laws are frequently what the judges say they are and not what the laws themselves say they are.
Only joking :razz:
Don't worry Mr Moo, we got turned down for TLA got the 'your site doesnt meet our criteria crap', but have been using auction ads for a while now and its been quite good.
If they don't let you in just sell your own text links, thats what we intend to do.
:mrgreen:
Perhaps spreading the word that your site contains illegal material was not the best form of linkbait! :grin:
Challenge him to a boxing match. Fight fight fight!
This looks like something that you could easily mooooove up the TLA food chain with and get overturned.
John Chow has no problem with the site, but even if he developed a brain tumor tomorrow and decided JohnCow had to go, there'd be nothing he could do about it unless you had some material lifted from his site.
Of course, this wouldn't have anything to do with your previous three comments in which you're asking us for a link back which still has not been posted yet?
And Steven, what's hilarious is your 1 rss reader.
And I really liked the stunt he carried out. Because, it was unexpected and he carried out it well. I don't visit blogs just for the information they give. It should be entertaining too. And I feel sorry that you couldn't enjoy this joke.
I am actually out of town on vacation right now so I don't want to spend too much time on the computer other than checking on my favorite cow =]
LMAO @ "How precious..." - JC
this is a simple mis-understanding brought upon by the cow himself. John, he obviously thinks that it is Chow that is suing, why not get chow to mail him, stating this is not the case and it was just a prank? :roll:
No need for the long, dramatical post is there?
Looks like a lot of heat is moooving around the barn ... Hey Cow ... Want me to "Horn" someone!
LOL
JB
Now if only Adwords accepted Paypal.
Welcome Back John!
The real kicker is this, just where is this copy that was infringed upon? John Chow's blog looks like any number of other blog templates out there, so that really cannot be claimed. The site is clearly a parody, which pretty much eradicates any weak claim about "look and feel" or similar sounding names. Furthermore, credit has been given and no known DMCA was issued in this matter.
Finally, reading the content and comparing the two sites for more than 5 minutes yields no similarities in terms of actual written copy. Although, this blog seems to offer a consistently higher quality "value" than John Chow.
TLA looks foolish in this matter for not applying any common sense or rationale thought to the matter.
You could end up owning TLA, if you get a good lawyer that will take the case on contingency.
I understand you are pissed about Jonathan's answers, but still you have no reason to believe that you have a RIGHT to be in the TLA publisher program, or?
christoph