<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>John Cow dot COM - Latest Comments in Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://johncowdotcom.disqus.com/</link><description>Learn making money online blogging tips that we have proven to work through effective online marketing strategies. No Theories just Proven Advice!</description><atom:link href="https://johncowdotcom.disqus.com/text_link_ads_says_we8217re_naughty/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:52:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383608</link><description>&lt;p&gt;People are getting a bit too Mooish around the web now-a-days!  :lol:&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vik</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:52:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383607</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's the point of any of our posts? And Patrick Gavin seems to believe we have a right to be in the TLA publisher program so we don't need a reason.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Cow</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 05:06:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383606</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now, so except for publishing the errtic back &amp;amp; forth between you and that new hire and TLA - what's the point of your post?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I understand you are pissed about Jonathan's answers, but still you have no reason to believe that you have a RIGHT to be in the TLA publisher program, or?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;christoph&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christoph</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 04:56:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383605</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Life is too short to get your panties in a wad over a really good joke Martin.  Can't get rid of MoneyBlogSite so you're hating on everyone else..sad.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;LMAO @ "How precious..." - JC&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sabrina's Money Matters</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:30:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL, not anymore!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sabrina's Money Matters</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:21:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the advice. I will take it down later this week ^_^&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am actually out of town on vacation right now so I don't want to spend too much time on the computer other than checking on my favorite cow =]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:50:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383602</link><description>&lt;p&gt;John Cow, you are turning out to be of the latest Internet Phenomenon, do you know that ? One more example of why controversy gets you maximum exposure...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Credence Dot Com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 10:08:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383601</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a much better way to deal with it, if you think twice.  :twisted:&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joshua</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 02:55:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383600</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This whole thing is too funny. There is no copyright infringement on your part.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You could end up owning TLA, if you get a good lawyer that will take the case on contingency.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">digitalnomad</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383599</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One might be tempted to write this off as the "Cow" bringing this one on himself. However, I think a fair number of us suspected the "lawsuit" was a stunt.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The real kicker is this, just where is this copy that was infringed upon? John Chow's blog looks like any number of other blog templates out there, so that really cannot be claimed. The site is clearly a parody, which pretty much eradicates any weak claim about "look and feel" or similar sounding names. Furthermore, credit has been given and no known DMCA was issued in this matter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finally, reading the content and comparing the two sites for more than 5 minutes yields no similarities in terms of actual written copy. Although, this blog seems to offer a consistently higher quality "value" than John Chow.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;TLA looks foolish in this matter for not applying any common sense or rationale thought to the matter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:12:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383598</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just got my TLA check today.  I got a nice $25 for an affiliate referral as well.  Completely forgot about that.  Need to push that more now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blog contests</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:24:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383597</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Try epassporte, Adwrods accept their virtual CC plus you can send money to your Paypal via them!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Welcome Back John!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cubofild</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 10:29:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am in love with TLA.  At first it started out with 3 links and then almost every other week or so i get a new e-mail.  This month I've sold another 2 links.  I'm up to 6 and some good extra cash.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now if only Adwords accepted Paypal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Personal Blog</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 09:18:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383595</link><description>&lt;p&gt;talk about kicking your self in the butt. Oh well I'm sure you will get it sorted out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">roundouts</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:38:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is already at &lt;a href="http://johnchow.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="johnchow.com"&gt;johnchow.com&lt;/a&gt;!  :mrgreen:  BTW when did buffalos arrive? I noticed too late.  :mrgreen:&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Navjot Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:04:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383593</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Displaying just 1 feed reader will distract readers away. Its user maintaility. if you have low subscribers and are showing that low figure, people will believe your blog is not good. So better wait till your rss subscribers reach near 50 or sow before you start displaying your feed chicklet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Navjot Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:58:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383592</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL count me in.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:19:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383591</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone up for getting a donation together to buy 'Martin' a sense of Humour ?  :twisted:&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fatgadget</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 03:32:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383590</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't sweat it. We can pretty much be guaranteed that Jonathan Dingman hasn't a clue what the legalities of copyright infringement are. And that's if he can somehow honestly convince himself that is what this blog has done.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">B. Durant</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 01:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383589</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well wel, nice post twin cow, :)was wondering what the real problem here actually.lols&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">limadang</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:16:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383588</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My blog is very new. Although I've own the domain for a while now, I just set up the blog not more than 2-3 months ago. And for about a month or so, I didn't update at all trying to pick a theme that I wanted to go with. There is nothing wrong with new blogs having low RSS subscribers, everyone's been there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:56:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383587</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will the real John Chow please stand up, please stand up. LOL&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:54:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383586</link><description>&lt;p&gt;TLA turned me down for not meeting criteria as well, shit happens MOOve on&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SimplyBananas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 22:30:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;WOW,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Looks like a lot of heat is moooving around the barn ... Hey Cow ... Want me to "Horn" someone!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;LOL&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;JB&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Buffalo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 22:25:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Says We&amp;#8217;re Naughty</title><link>http://www.johncow.com/text-link-ads-says-were-naughty/#comment-9383584</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Martin - To you this site may be full of garbage. But there are hundreds of regular visitors here, to whom this site is good. And I am one of them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I really liked the stunt he carried out. Because, it was unexpected and he carried out it well. I don't visit blogs just for the information they give. It should be entertaining too. And I feel sorry that you couldn't enjoy this joke.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joyce Babu</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 22:07:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>